An analysis by Joshua Stark from Transform: In his January budget proposal for fiscal year 2016-17, Governor Brown reintroduced his plan for addressing the state’s dwindling transportation revenues and its crumbling infrastructure. When it comes to creating real transportation choices, the proposal is a mixed bag. On the one hand, the Governor’s proposal finally increases transportation funding, and directs that funding largely into sorely needed road maintenance and new public transportation. On the other hand, it fails to include a fix for our oversubscribed walking and biking fund, the Active Transportation Program (ATP). It also diverts climate funds to so-called “Low Carbon Roads” that may have dubious uses. Let me take you for a tour of the Governor’s plan, starting with the revenues.
Excellent interview on the Smart Cities Insider blog with former LA Metro Transportation Planning Manager Tim Papandreou, now Director of Strategic Planning and Policy at Muni in San Francisco. He says Metro has done a better job of unifying the transit network with one brand and one transit pass, in being innovative with its fare policy, Metro Rapid, passing sales taxes to create a strong funding base, and check this: About Metro's brand he says: "It's a very happy and upbeat brand . . . It says 'Try transit, it's fun, you're cool, [transit is] sexy.' LA Metro looks and feels like the Apple of transit." But San Francisco wins, he says, in terms of bikes, parking, TOD, pedestrian safety, shared mobility and overall transit network coverage: "There are only a few places in [San Francisco]," he says, "where you are more than a couple of blocks away from the transit network, and [transit is] also more frequent than in Los Angeles." Read it.
CityLab's Eric Jaffe writes: Under existing rules employees who ride public transit can get as much as $130/month in IRS commuter benefits, but people who drive to work and park can get up to $250. Beginning next year this playing field levels out. (Finally!! I worked on this issue way back in 1996 when I first became a transit advocate!) But, Jaffe writes, the lure of free or cheap parking is so great, especially when paired with the convenience of driving, that the benefits alone are not enough to make commuters give up driving. The better way, obviously, is to offer transit benefits but charge market rate for parking . . . Read it on CityLab.
A quick sum-up: Yes this is the largest transit expansion in the USA, with 5 lines under construction and 2 milestones coming up this spring with the opening of the Expo Line to Santa Monica and the Gold Line to Azusa, deep in the San Gabriel Valley. The Crenshaw Line to LAX is 50% done and the Regional Connector (which connects existing lines downtown to provide one-seat rides -- no transfers required -- from Pasadena to Santa Monica, for example, or Culver City to Long Beach) is almost 20% of the way toward completion. Still to come: the build-out of Union Station, which Joel likens to "a second downtown in DTLA," rail linkages to the rest of the state with high-speed rail and, of course, the possibility of a sequel to the Measure R sales tax for transportation on the 2016 ballot. Read it on the Huffington Post.
Creator Neil Freeman says people "disproportionately order the posters in DC, NY, OR, CT, or MA, and not in AR, MO, LA, OK." You can order your's here.
If Parking On Campus Is a Problem, Student Transit Passes Could Be the Answer, Denny Zane Tells the LA Times
Parking for students and faculty is a problem at colleges and universities across LA County and the nation, but land for parking lots/structures and the money required to build them (underground parking can range upwards of $30,000 per space -- money that should be used for educational purposes instead) is always in short supply. Moreover, schools are less interested in accommodating solo drivers these days and more interested in going green and encouraging students to carshare/bikeshare and use public transit. That's why Move LA has been working with LA County Supervisor/LA Metro Board Chair Mark Ridley-Thomas on a universal student transit pass program. "[Student transit passes] would really give more students access to education, because mass transit is much cheaper than driving a car," Move LA Executive Director Denny Zane told the LA Times. "And community college students especially often work part-time, so it would make it possible for them to get to school and work and make it affordable." Read the story in Sunday's LA Times!
Steve Hymon just posted this on The Source: Earlier today, President Obama signed into law the long-term surface transportation authorization bill recently passed by Congress - Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). Yesterday, both the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed the new transportation law. The bill authorizes approximately $305 billion for Highway, Transit and Railroad programs over 5 years ($61 billion per year). Passage of the FAST Act by Congress and President Obama signing the measure into law today ends a process of Congress repeatedly adopting extensions to the current surface transportation authorization law – MAP-21.
“The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is proud of the leading role U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer and members of the Los Angeles County Congressional Delegation played in passing the long term surface transportation bill that President Obama signed into law today,” shared Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Chair Mark Ridley-Thomas. “In addition to Senator Boxer’s remarkable effort to ensure passage of this bill, we are grateful of the leading role that Congresswoman Grace Napolitano played as a conferee for the FAST Act and the support of Congresswoman Janice Hahn, in her capacity as a member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. Metro will be securing approximately $600 million in formula funding from the FAST Act over the next federal fiscal year to enhance mobility for Los Angeles County’s ten million residents. We can also expect the FAST Act to deliver hundreds of millions of dollars to Los Angeles County in the coming year to build our growing rail system. Lastly, I want to personally thank President Obama for signing the FAST Act into law today,” added Chair Ridley-Thomas.
iTransit is a growing advocacy network of organizations and people standing up for better transit in California, and is organized by the California Transit Association, already 200 members strong. iTransit makes it REALLY easy to contact your legislators and tell them to support transit funding! Join as an individual or organization and they'll keep you in the loop! The CA Legislature is coming back into session really soon!!!
From Stephen Lee Davis on the T4America Blog: For the first time in a decade, Congress is on the cusp of passing a 5-year transportation authorization bill that will carry us into the next decade. Though we await final floor votes and the President’s signature, it will almost certainly be approved in a matter of days. So how does the bill stack up against the pressing needs of our country? While the final bill has changed only slightly from the separate versions passed by the House and the Senate since July, we’re going to take a slightly different tack than our usual “ten things you need to know,” and break this bill up into the good, the bad, and the ugly.