The Harbor Subdivision Line: This is the 1st in a series on transit corridor projects that have been proposed by transportation stakeholders in South LA. Currently there is no funding for these projects, but they could be funded by a new sales tax measure that's under discussion for the November 2016 ballot.
The Harbor Subdivision is a 26-mile-long Metro-owned railroad right-of-way that could offer a one-seat ride from downtown LA’s Union Station to LAX, and that would connect the Crenshaw, Green and Blue lines to important destinations in downtown LA, South LA, the South Bay and Long Beach, and to LAX and the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. It is a project that demonstrates how every incremental addition to our rail system provides ever increasing value because it provides connections to an ever larger set of destinations.Read more
The Strategic Growth Council today announced awards for Round 1 of the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program to 28 projects statewide. Our 6-county region posted 8 of the top 10 highest scoring projects, but in total received only 23% of the total $122 million available from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.Read more
Here's the most recent version (#33!) of our "strawman" proposal. It keeps changing because of ongoing conversations and new information, and with the goal of creating an ever broader and more engaged coalition of those who are interested in transportation investments.
Projects Likely To Be Funded With Money From The Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program Divided Evenly Between North & South
Streetsblog also reports that California’s Strategic Growth Council has announced its recommendations for the first round of funding from the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program, with 28 projects to be awarded $122 million and the recommended projects split almost evenly between north and south. The AHSC program is funded by California’s Cap & Trade auctions. Most of the recommended projects are infill housing that includes transit, pedestrian or bicycle improvements. The recommended projects are expected to be approved by the SGC at a meeting on June 30, with workshops planned for July in northern and southern California to discuss the lessons learned. Read Melanie Curry’s story here. A list of the projects recommended for funding is available here, and summary project descriptions can be found here.
Despite it’s suspicious title — the DRIVE (Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy) Act — the new federal transportation bill proposed by the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee “is not as big a disaster as you might think” to quote Streetsblog. The story goes on to explain that the new 6-year bill is neither a step forward nor a step back, mainly continues existing policies related to streets and highways, and does not include the transit title, which will be drafted by the Banking Committee soon.Read more
The 2nd in a blog series on what Move LA’s partners are saying about the investments needed to fix LA County’s notorious transportation problems -- and climate change.
Jonathan Parfrey’s nonprofit Climate Resolve and the new Path to Positive campaign are mobilizing mainstream local support for climate action, and championing the leadership of Governor Brown and state leaders in setting bold climate goals for the state. Jonathan has called a meeting with 100 local leaders tomorrow at the top of LA City Hall, including LA County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl; LA City Councilmembers Mike Bonin, Paul Koretz, Mitch Englander, Joe Buscaino and Mitch O’Farrell; LA City Attorney Mike Feuer and Controller Ron Galperin; UCLA’s Richard Jackson, former director of the national Centers for Disease Control’s National Center for Environmental Health, and many others. The goal is to mobilize constituents from public, private and nonprofit sectors around climate issues in a way that honors the LA region's progressive tradition of bold action.Read more
U.S. House Rejects Amendment To Ban Federal Dollars From Being Used for Sidewalks, Bike Racks and Lighting At New Transit Stations
This just in from the Safe Routes to School National Partnership:
An amendment to prevent federal New Starts funding from being used to install sidewalks, bike racks, and lighting as part of new transit projects — essentially making it much more difficult to create safe, cost-effective and affordable ways for people to get to new lines and stations — was narrowly defeated, 214 to 212, this week. Please thank your Congressmember!Read more
A Discussion: What's Right and Not-Yet-Right About The New Affordable Housing & Sustainable Communities Program
The Strategic Growth Council green-lighted 54 projects to prepare full proposals for the new Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program in March -- a big new pot of Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund money (from the Cap & Trade program) for all kinds of good projects, including infill and compact housing, transit, active transportation, complete streets, and other GHG and air pollution reduction projects and programs. Since then a lot of people have been trying to figure out why the Bay Area was given the go-ahead to apply for 40% of the AHSC pie, when Southern California was invited to apply for only 20%, even though SoCal has twice the population and significantly greater need: 50% of AHSC funding is to go to "disadvantaged communities" -- defined as "areas disproportionately burdened by and vulnerable to multiple sources of pollution" -- 67% of which are located in SoCal.Read more
As Los Angeles County gears up its transit construction program and contemplates another county sales tax measure to help build even more transit, advocates, elected officials and neighborhoods continue to debate which transportation investments to make, and whether the beneficiaries will be the rich or the poor. This makes a recent post on The New York Times "Upshot" website particularly interesting: It refers to an ongoing Harvard study on the factors that predict whether a low-income family will escape from poverty, which has found that commute time is the single strongest factor – the longer the average commute, the worse the chances that a family will be able to move up the economic ladder.Read more