The LA Times says in an editorial that "California's landmark tax measure is back on the table. And it should be."
But perhaps there's a better framing for a discussion of whether a two-thirds vote should be required for the passage of a local sales tax measure, such as: Should a minority of voters be able to dictate what happens? Or should a "no" vote count twice as much as a "yes" vote? Or should we restore democracy by lowering the voter threshold to 55%?
Read the LA Times here.
But perhaps there's a better framing for a discussion of whether a two-thirds vote should be required for the passage of a local sales tax measure, such as: Should a minority of voters be able to dictate what happens? Or should a "no" vote count twice as much as a "yes" vote? Or should we restore democracy by lowering the voter threshold to 55%?
Read the LA Times here.
Do you like this post?